data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e71c/6e71c29aa7a248c3d346b99e4c7de3d880969822" alt=""
The guy who plays Charles Brown is over the top, and the Keats actor guy does a lot of acting with his eyeballs, but he is also quiet and I like the way they show him spending so much time just lying around waiting for inspiration, worrying about finding a subject. Those scenes seem more true than the readings of the actual poems, which, even though they are shot in fragments to feel casual, still feel like set-pieces rolled out to fanfares.
So on my personal movie scale of Avatar on the low end up to "not bad" at the high end, Bright Star earns an "I really like the dresses and the lying around parts."
3 comments:
We both liked it. Silly in parts but entertaining enough. I loved the butterflies in the bedroom.
Why has no one ever come up with the idea of making a period piece that isn't so hellbent on being proper and mirthless? Well, I guess Sofia Coppola did, but why hasn't anybody ELSE done that?
Do you ever have the 'did they all really talk like that?' problem, or is it true that they did all really talk like that?
I'm still pulling for the period piece where a character beings a sentence with "like, um." Surely these two verbal tics haven't been born in the last ten years.
That said, have you seen Sweetie?
Well, if they didn't talk that way, I have to kill myself. Some things you just need to believe.
And I thought Coppola's attempt was just plain daffy.
I could swear I saw Sweetie during a film class back in the early nineties, but don't remember anything about it.
Post a Comment